An increasing number of congregations within the Lutheran Church have adopted the practice of refusing public Baptism if the child was born out of wedlock. Their policy requires such children to receive the Sacrament of Baptism in private only.
This simply cannot be!
I am not suggesting that there are no cases in which the Pastor refuses to perform a Baptism (that’s a different matter altogether), but when a Pastor requires Baptism to be private, for any reason, he misunderstands the distinction between Law and Gospel.
I am not suggesting that there are no cases in which the Pastor refuses to perform a Baptism (that’s a different matter altogether), but when a Pastor requires Baptism to be private, for any reason, he misunderstands the distinction between Law and Gospel.
As I understand it, the pietistic intention of such a practice is to not give the public impression of approval to the sinful lifestyle of the parents. There is, however, another way to handle such a concern. Teach and preach! Catechize and admonish! If the Pastor is doing this hard leg-work, meeting with the unwed parents, dealing with their sin of adultery in a proper way, calling them to repentance, and restoring them to the fold of Christ with absolution, then there is no reason to require that the forgiveness of sins be received behind locked doors.
For if Baptism is in fact a means of grace, then there is no precedent
for refusing it’s public administration. The congregation has no
authority to establish a law that one must fulfill (i.e. being legitimately born) in order to be
publicly accepted into the Kingdom of God. The Sacrament of Holy Baptism is not Holy because of the moral disposition of the recipient, but because of the one dispensing grace through such means. Because of Christ. Since it is performed on His authority, the Church must not turn Christ's Baptism into a shameful act no matter how ghastly the sinner might be. Rather it is our sinful state that requires such baptizing in the first place.
While there are situations where baptisms are performed outside the Divine Service, these are exceptions, not punishments, and they are anything but private. Those baptisms are announced at the next service and celebrated in the community of Christ's Church for exactly what it is, the working of the forgiveness of sins, the rescuing from death and the devil, and the giving of eternal salvation!
When a congregation demands that any Baptism to be performed privately, this treats public Baptism as an earned privilege. It says that the means of grace must not be celebrated if your sin is public knowledge. To this I humbly submit these words from Walther:
While there are situations where baptisms are performed outside the Divine Service, these are exceptions, not punishments, and they are anything but private. Those baptisms are announced at the next service and celebrated in the community of Christ's Church for exactly what it is, the working of the forgiveness of sins, the rescuing from death and the devil, and the giving of eternal salvation!
When a congregation demands that any Baptism to be performed privately, this treats public Baptism as an earned privilege. It says that the means of grace must not be celebrated if your sin is public knowledge. To this I humbly submit these words from Walther:
“When someone preaches that a person must be virtuous to earn his way into heaven, people praise this as a sermon of righteousness. However, when these same people hear the message “Come unto Me all you who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest,” offering grace to all sinners without distinction, they are offended by it and consider it to be a false doctrine. They reply: “How should this or that great sinner be able to come into heaven just as well as I, who from childhood have been intent on virtue and uprightness? Away with such a religion!” These people look upon God’s goodness with evil. What a horrible sin! God’s Word tells us that the angels in heaven rejoice over a sinner who repents and finds grace. Therefore, whoever does not wish the Gospel of grace to be received by a sinner becomes a devil, and his wish is that all of humanity would perish. He becomes a devil even against himself, for whoever looks with evil because a sinner has been offered grace rejects the Gospel, shuts himself off from grace, and becomes irretrievably lost.”
C.F.W. Walther God Grant It, 201
Thanks for reading!

Good post, Pastor. About 20 years ago I was at a Bible study at Village Lutheran in Ladue MO. That church is familiar to many because it's about 30 feet from the seminary (OK, it's a bit further but not much). There was a heated discussion of this very issue. I would say about 2/3 of the people, including 2 or 3 retired seminary professors, said that a public baptism in that situation was improper, largely for the reasons you state. To me, it's the child's baptism and we don't impute the sins of the parent to the child, and we certainly don't get to pick and choose which sins to impute. The whole point is forgiveness of sins anyway, right? If a church is embarrassed to receive sinners or children of sinners, it's seems like it's stopped being a church and started being something else.
ReplyDeleteChris, I know and love Village Ladue. It was the church my family attended while at Seminary when we weren't driving the hour trip to my field work congregation. I can't speak for the profs, or for their current pastor Rev. Golden who is a stellar pastor, but this issue seems to revolve around whether or not the pastor is doing the hard work of admonishing the unwed couple, telling them to repent. If they do not and thereby reject Christ and His gifts, then you probably don't have a baptism anymore. If they repent of their sin, receive forgiveness, and are restored to the Church, then what reasoning do we have to refuse their public baptism?
DeleteYour post assumes that they are done only for one reason, and that reason is pietistic and/or lazy, recalcitrance on the pastor's part. I'm not so sure we can be so quick to lay down another law.
ReplyDeleteI do private baptisms of those who have had children out of wedlock. This is not the case for all, but for most. I do it not for the sake of the congregation, taking a stand against sin, but because of the shame of the parents and sometimes even the grandparents. Sometimes it is too much to bear for them to come and put their sin on display even more than it already is. Yet, they desire baptism for their child. And so, I do this privately to cover their shame, not only by the love of Christ in the Gospel but out of fervent love for my neighbor.
Pr. Braaten, thanks for your comment!
DeleteYou are correct to point out that there are other reasons for conducting a private baptism, and I understand your very pastoral decision to cover their shame in Christian love by means of private baptism. However, there is a great difference between the unwed parent asking for a private baptism and the pastor or congregation requiring it. I am referring to the latter. Making it a law that the sin of adultery requires private baptism is an abuse of the office and has no biblical ground.
Thanks for adding to the discussion brother!
I agree with Pr. Braaten. In the cases where unmarried couples have a child baptized, it is not the couple wishing the baptism but the grandparents/great-grandparents, etc. The mom and dad seem to be along for the ride. More often that not, grandparents, etc., are ashamed of how the couple are dealing with their living together. I do speak to this issue with couples, but in my experience this goes nowhere. The mom and dad seem to be recalcitrant. I don't see them or the child unless another family member brings them. Outside of trying to contact the unwed parents and encourage them to repent, as well as bring their child(ren) back to church, I don't know what else to do but trust the Word to work.
ReplyDeletePr. Juhl, see my above response to Pr. Braaten. I'm primarily speaking of those pastors who require all children of unwed parents to be baptized outside of the Divine Service.
DeleteThanks for adding to the discussion.
I just discovered your blog from Facebook. Love all the Latin!!! Also I had no idea this was happening in the LCMS. Very sad. I like what Rev. Juhl says also," Trust the Word to work."
ReplyDeleteAs a mom of 3 boys I have secret commando wishes for my grandchildren if they do not get them baptized as infants. Not a one attends the LCMS anymore. Believe me I keep "trusting the Word to work!"